Virgil Griffith discovered the allure of hacking in 1993, while slumped at an Intel 80386 system in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. He was 10, and he was on a lose streak at Star Wars: X-Wing. To hit the leaderboard, he’d necessity a fleet of superstar wingmen, but this is the only way had one X-Wing fighter that could comprise its own in the game’s World War I-style dogfights. Desperate times call for desperate measurings. Excavating around in the game’s code, Griffith found that each pilot had its own file, so he cloned his good fighter. Copy and paste, photocopy and adhesive, transcript and paste–fully 20 times. This dedicated him, he told me year later, “a plentiful supply of the best wingmen from then on.” Players without Griffith’s workaround were out of luck.

Those brave pilots, gouged from the game’s code, seemed to serve as Griffith’s guardian angel in the next few years, during which he lived by the hacker’s creed: Enlightened cheating is the highest form of gameplay. You don’t beat the TIE fighters. You beat the game itself.

While in college at the University of Alabama, Griffith discovered a chink in the ID card system that let students cadge cafeteria banquets. In 2007, shortly after graduate, he invented WikiScanner, a service that uncovered the IP addresses and ideological biases of anonymous Wikipedia edits.( In one case, he revealed that people from agencies in the US Senate were trying to fix their reputations, where others from Diebold, the company that made insecure voting machines, were employing Wikipedia for corporate propaganda ). He was on his style to black-hat status–and the circle of Julian Assange–when he discovered something even better than hacking: science.

Griffith is now a 34 -year-old research scientist at Ethereum Research in Singapore, where he works on improving the company’s blockchain, a big part of the global infrastructure that allows for procure exchanges of property and currency online. With essential software, he wrote in an email to me, “failures simply aren’t acceptable anymore.” Examples he cites include controlling nuclear reactor, electricity grid, microchip manufacturing. “There is a trend in software growing away from the’ hacker’ jury-rigging into a mature realm, where things are’ proven’, ” he told me.

The chastening of the proscribe hacker does not make a great campfire narration. Maybe that story is too close to the tedious process of growing up. But with Silicon Valley convulsed by revelations of Big Tech’s security failures, founders’ above-the-law arrogance, and social media’s hospitality to bots, trolls, and hoax, here’s a remedy: honest valuations, business ethics, and the application of scientific technique unmolested by avarice. It’s time for a twilight of the hacker ideal.

The chastening of the outlaw hacker does not make a great campfire tale.

I came by this a year ago, when Joi Ito, administrator of the MIT Media Lab, told WIRED that the hacker archetype had determined its highest enunciation in one Donald Trump. Like it or not, Ito argued, Trump represents the counterculture priority of disobedience over compliance. I shudder to repeat Ito’s view, but here it is: Trump was “very punk rock.”

Trump did indeed hack the American system. His was an especially crude hacker, though it did the trick, chiefly because he had the field to himself; for his opponents, Trump-style violations of America’s words of service–bald-face lying, inciting violence–were not strategically or ethically inbounds. The 1910 race to the South Pole comes to mind: The Norwegian explorers figured they could win if they left nothing edible unconsumed, and eat their sled puppies along the way as provisions. The British, committed to their geological learns as much as to winning, refused to eat theirs on principle–and lost. Trump won because he was unhindered by conscience. He feed his dogs.

Hacking a win is a question of principle. But it’s also a question of pride. In the short term, thumping the system–especially a big one, like the IRS or American democracy–must harvest an overman swell of dominance to those who seem to be its slaves. But in another sense, a succes secured by illicitly cloning wingmen( or concealing tax returns, eating huskies) doesn’t seem like a victory at all. It’s a confession–even if a tacit one–that you weren’t good enough to win the real way.

Icarus, the documentary about Russian doping at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, gives a window on why the Kremlin would be so eager for ill-gotten gold medals that it would hack both the biochemistry of Russia’s best jocks and the painstaking system for attaining sure jocks compete clean. Russian authorities wagered that a rococo cloak-and-dagger biohacking and burglary scheme would work better than traditional trained for athletes. Yes, the Russians swept the table that year–but the revelation of their widespread doping asterisks all those medals as suspicious for eternity. That cruel and gratuitous hacker also irreparably injury the bodies, reputations, and futures of the nation’s finest athletes, who are regarded as cheaters, with Russia’s team now banned from the 2018 Olympics.

Related Stories