Captain, I recommend we go to Red Alert. We’re detecting signs of a very bad mind simply off the starboard bow.
Famed director Quentin Tarantino has apparently set himself on a collision course with the Star Trek franchise, according to a report by Deadline . The Hollywood trade site says Tarantino is keen to direct a Trek film and has discussed his idea with Trek producer J.J. Abrams; the pair are reportedly at the stage of assembling a writer’s room.
Is this likely to actually pan off in the long run? Possibly. Tarantino does know his Trek, and he and Abrams have worked together before( Tarantino guest-starred on Alias ). Should it? Hell no.
Everyone has their own take on Tarantino, an unusually divisive filmmaker. Mine has chilled over the years as the director has done little but double down on his “blood-soaked revenge played for tense laughs” trope. I loved Reservoir Dogs when I first recognized it; by the time I learnt its warehouse standoff remake in cowboy cosplay as Hateful 8 , I rolled my eyes.
But the one thing you can’t deny about Tarantino is that the worldview disclosed through his movies is profoundly cynical. Might always induces right; if the good guys win, it’s because they were more violent than the bad guys and pandered their basest instincts.
Think of the scalp-taking soldiers of Inglourious Basterds — the lesson from that movie is torture is justified if the subject is sick and evil. Now imagine humen in Federation uniforms scalping the Klingons.
This is total “darkest timeline” stuff. We’re officially in the mirror world.
If there is a mindset further opposite of that of Gene Roddenberry, the man who created Star Trek, I can’t think of it.
Roddenberry was a profoundly hopeful disciple in the essential goodness of humankind. Star Trek was founded in the idea that utopia is inevitable, given enough time. By the 23 rd century of the show, disease, poverty, racism and all internal human discord has disappeared.
Roddenberry was a profoundly hopeful believer in the essential goodness of man
Replicators render everything we could crave, so money is unnecessary. There’s nothing left to fight over. That’s why the present and its heirs have almost always focused on the final frontier and humanity’s desire to come to words with “strange new life” — because back on Globe, life is wonderfully perfect and dull.
Roddenberry took this notion too far in his later years, and the writers of Star Trek: The Next Generation chafed under his dictum that there shouldn’t ever be any conflict amongst the crew of the Enterprise. Still, the desire was to attain the reveal a lighthouse of hope and reason, and this desire led to one of the best series on television.
Picard and his crew were truly noble, a word that seems to have fallen out of favor since then. They were thoughtful. They were just. They did things by the book and you could look up to them for that.
Star Trek is at its best when it espouses that aristocracy, and subdivides fans when it doesn’t. After Abrams rebooted Star Trek, in the appropriately named Into Darknes s, we assured a Captain Kirk whose traditional hot-headedness had spilled over into smiting his adversaries for the sake of smiting.
The almost-as-disappointing Star Trek Beyond handed the dealership to Justin Lin, who took it so far into action movie territory. Tarantino would seem to confirm the downward tendency, drowning Star Trek in buckets of green blood.
But is that really what we need in 2017? When the planet seems further away than ever from a utopian future, don’t we need eyesights of that utopian future more urgently than ever? When the stronger boy in the world is a study in lawlessness, Tarantino’s self-interested anti-heroes are a galaxy away from the various kinds of idealism we miss in our movies.
Perhaps Tarantino wants to try something new; perhaps he wants to astonish us. Trek does have a way of rehabilitating cynical Hollywood men at the midlife crisis stage; simply look at Seth Macfarlane’s surprisingly earnest Next Generation homage, The Orville .
But actually, if Paramount and Abrams actually want to try something new and edgy, how about this radical mind: pick an actual female administrator for the next cinema. Devoted that Tarantino admitted that he ignored many direct warning signs about Harvey Weinstein for decades, he is doubly the incorrect boy at the incorrect time for the right dealership.
Star Trek can help usher in a utopia of representation behind the scenes as well as on the screen. Please, Paramount, make it so.